Straight-Rate Springs vs. Progressive
Rate Springs
Over the last 20 years, one of the biggest changes in the aftermarket
motorcycle suspension world has been the virtually complete switch
from progressive rate springs to straight rate ones. I think it’s
safe to say that there’s not a single reputable suspension
tuner who advocates progressive springs. The question is why? What’s
the problem with a progressive rate? Why are straight rate springs
better?
One of the problems is that bikes, street bikes anyway, just don’t
have enough travel to take advantage of progressive rates. The soft initial
portion gets blown right through, leaving a limited amount of travel
for the stiffer portion to deal with. This results in less compliance,
less traction and a harsher ride. Another issue is damping; Damping
rates, particularly rebound damping, need to be matched to the spring
rate. With a progressive (i.e. variable) rate, that’s impossible.
Damping is always a compromise and a progressive rate just makes
the balancing act that much more difficult. Adding to the problem
is that modern forks actually have 2 spring mediums, the steel coil
and the air trapped inside. The air is intrinsically a highly progressive
spring. Adding a progressively wound steel spring to the mix is
just making a bad situation worse.
|